Anglų kalba: gal kas užmatysite loginę/gramatinę klaidą? :)

In these days, all people have their own cars and they don't use the public transport very often.

People don't want to use the bicycles instead of the cars, they don't want to recycle things, because

they think it is wasting of the time. In the cities, there aren't many trees and green areas, so the air in

the cities is more polluted.

The government could improve the public transport. If they did it, people would use the public

transport instead of the cars to drive somewhere.

People could also use the bicycles instead of the cars. If they did it, there wouldn't be so much

traffic fumes.

People could also recycle things. If they did it, there wouldn't be so many dumps in the cities.

People could plant trees and create more green areas . If they did it, there would be more clean air

because the trees produce oxygen, which is a basic need for people.

All in all, if the suggestions in this article became reality, the cities would be more cleaner

and we would be proud of them.

Taip iš skaitymo, bendro supratimo, kaip ir viskas gerai atrodo, tvarkingai. Bet kaip jums? :) Rašau straipsnį mokykloje

Dėkoju už sugaištą laiką. :)

In these days, all people have their own cars and they don't use the public transport very often. - ne visi žmonės turi savo mašinas.

In these days, all people have their own cars and they don't use the public transport very often. - ne visi žmonės turi savo mašinas.

Dėkoju, loginę klaidą padariau.

In these days, almost all people have their own cars and they don't use the public transport very often.

Pataisiau

In these days, most people have their own cars and don't use public transport very often.

People don't want to use bicycles instead of cars, they don't want to recycle trash, because it is thought to be a waste of time. In the cities, there aren't many trees and green areas, so the air is more polluted.

Firstly, the government could change the situation by improving public transport. As a result, people would use the public

transport instead of cars to get somewhere.

What is more, people could also use bicycles instead of cars. Thus, there wouldn't be so much traffic jams and the air would be cleaner.

Moreover, people could recycle trash. If they did it, there wouldn't be so many dumps and cities would be cleaner.

Finally, people could plant trees and create more green areas. If they did it, there would be more clean air

because trees use carbon dioxide to produce oxygen, which is a basic need for people.

All in all, if all suggestions of this article became reality, cities would be more cleaner

and we could be proud of them.

Man atrodo, kad the pratiškai visur blogai panaudotas :?.Ir naudok jungiamuosius kaip in addition, futhermore ir t.t nes dabar visi sakiniai vienodi

Man atrodo, kad the pratiškai visur blogai panaudotas :?.Ir naudok jungiamuosius kaip in addition, futhermore ir t.t nes dabar visi sakiniai vienodi

Tamstai reiktų pasimokinti daiktavardžius anglų kalboje :) Beveik visada prieš daiktavardį yra dedamas the arba a/an :) Mokytoja patikrino puse, visur taip pat buvo, t.y prieš daiktavardžius buvo the, tai viskas ok buvo :)

Tamstai reiktų pasimokinti daiktavardžius anglų kalboje :) Beveik visada prieš daiktavardį yra dedamas the arba a/an :) Mokytoja patikrino puse, visur taip pat buvo, t.y prieš daiktavardžius buvo the, tai viskas ok buvo :)

Mano laikais the prieš daugiskaitą nebūdavo dedamas, išskyrus tokius kurie neturi vienaskaitos, specifinius daiktavardžius ir dar ten būdavo kažkokių atvėjų. Nors gal jau nebepamenu...

Man tai tų the irgi per daug kažkaip atrodo. Tiksliai taisyklės nepaskaysiu, bet iš klausos girdisi, kad per daug. ;D

Nu man tai normaliai čia viskas atrodo kaip ir :D Taisyklės internete neradau tikslios, paieškosiu knygoje, jei rasiu pacituosiu

Nenaudok tiek daug ,,If they did it'' ir manau sita sakiny - they think it is wasting of the time, pakeisk i they think it's a waste of time, taip zymiai geriau skamba.

Nu man tai normaliai čia viskas atrodo kaip ir :D Taisyklės internete neradau tikslios, paieškosiu knygoje, jei rasiu pacituosiu

Perdaug nesigilindamas paredagavau pirmą pranešimą pagal taip kaip aš rašyčiau

Nenaudok tiek daug ,,If they did it'' ir manau sita sakiny - they think it is wasting of the time, pakeisk i they think it's a waste of time, taip zymiai geriau skamba.

Pakeičiau :)

Perdaug nesigilindamas paredagavau pirmą pranešimą pagal taip kaip aš rašyčiau

Nieko neturiu prieš. Gyvename laisvoje valstybėje. :)

Rašiniuose negali būti trumpinių: jokių "don't", "wouldn't" rašyk pilnai - do not, would not :)

Per daug pasikartojimų (repetitions) - čia jau gramatinė klaida. Juk lietuvių kalboje kiekviename sakinyje nevartoji tų pačių žodžių - tai tiesiog gramatinė klaida :). Bandyk konstruoti kitaip sakinius.

Kas dėl artikelių, tai tų the tikrai per daug (artikelis visada vartojamas vienaskaitoje, o daugiskaitoje - ne). Pataisiau, kur tikrai žinau, kad nereikia (labai išskirtinių atvėjų nežinau)

In these days, all people have their own cars and they don't use the (daugiskaita, žodį tekste mini pirmą kartą, todėl the nereik) public transport very often.

People don't want to use the bicycles instead of the cars, they don't want to recycle things, because

they think it is wasting of the time (išsireiškimas "waste of time"). In the cities, there aren't many trees and green areas, so the air in

the cities is more polluted.

The government could improve the public transport. If they did it, people would use the public

transport instead of the cars to drive somewhere.

People could also use the bicycles instead of the cars. If they did it, there wouldn't be so much

traffic fumes.

People could also recycle things. If they did it, there wouldn't be so many dumps in the cities.

People could plant trees and create more green areas . If they did it, there would be more clean air

because the trees produce oxygen, which is a basic need for people.

All in all, if the suggestions in this article became reality, the cities would be more cleaner

and we would be proud of them (čia man kažkaip neskamba tas sakinys. Miestai būtų švaresni, todėl mes galėtume jais didžiuotis?:).